Compliance-facing triage

Accessibility Risk Checker

This checker is a triage layer, not a legal certification. It helps teams find visible risk early, understand where manual review is needed, and decide whether a focused remediation sprint is justified.

Diagnostic intent

Visible accessibility risk

This public tool is designed to capture a sharper lead, prepare the right review context, and route the visitor toward a credible HAAM audit, sprint, or implementation conversation.

Public sector

Useful when the team needs a clearer outside signal before spending more time or budget.

universities

Useful when the team needs a clearer outside signal before spending more time or budget.

culture

Useful when the team needs a clearer outside signal before spending more time or budget.

ecommerce

Useful when the team needs a clearer outside signal before spending more time or budget.

SaaS

Useful when the team needs a clearer outside signal before spending more time or budget.

Inputs

What the visitor provides

The tool keeps the intake small enough to complete, but specific enough to support useful follow-up.

  • Website URL
  • Important pages
  • Known user complaints
  • Procurement or launch deadline

Review model

What HAAM should inspect

The first version collects the request. A full backend can attach evidence collection, screenshots, scoring, and reviewer approval behind the same page.

  • Accessible names, labels, headings, landmarks, and page language
  • Keyboard-sensitive controls, focus order, and trapped interactions
  • Contrast, target size, motion, overflow, and mobile usability risk
  • Forms, errors, messages, and completion-critical journeys
  • Where automated checks end and manual testing must begin

Lead magnet output

What the prospect should receive

The goal is not a giant automated report. The goal is a compact, credible artifact that makes the next conversation easier.

  • Risk-ranked accessibility issue list
  • Manual review checklist
  • Remediation sprint recommendation
  • Evidence notes for stakeholder discussion

Example findings

The language should be specific, conservative, and useful

These examples show the type of signal the tool is meant to surface. Real findings should only be sent after evidence is collected and reviewed.

Example 1

A high-value form may be difficult to complete with keyboard-only navigation.

Example 2

Navigation and filter controls need clearer accessible names and state announcements.

Example 3

Automated checks are only a starting point because the main risk sits inside task completion.

Conversion path

Route the visitor into a serious project request

The call to action preloads the selected tool into HAAM start flow so the request has context before a conversation begins.

Help improve this website?

Optional Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity measure content performance and usability. They load only if you allow them. Form values, email addresses, and chat messages are never included in analytics events.